tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080885971644496896.post8557185805751063148..comments2010-03-03T07:23:59.885-05:00Jens Axel Søgaardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15211030864341077735noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080885971644496896.post-40427347681512214602010-03-03T07:23:59.875-05:002010-03-03T07:23:59.875-05:00There are 102,295,446,100,979 nodes. Which is a lot. If we somehow used only a single pixel per node (at the standard 72dpi) that would require a monitor that was more that 2 miles square to display the entire thing.Robbyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08402308775580442837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080885971644496896.post-91889927458188589302010-03-02T06:47:53.712-05:002010-03-02T06:47:53.712-05:00Sadly, not close. Lets make this easier. If you're within a trillion of the correct answer, you win.Robbyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08402308775580442837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080885971644496896.post-29598127888045084302010-03-01T00:04:47.912-05:002010-03-01T00:04:47.912-05:00Okay, I'll give it a go on the scale you indicate: ... 282 billion? (9^12)Kohathhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12242792031255007733noreply@blogger.com